VAULT DWELLERS SERVED

Sunday, November 4, 2012

One Million Years B.C.


I was just watching the start of this schlockfest (best thing in it is Raquel Welch) and I was thinking about how lacking modern humans are in the most basic reasoning skills.

The film opens showing a group of people constantly at each other's throats, brother against brother, barely able to even organize the simple killing of a boar. They do not bother to pick up a fallen man and leave him to die of a broken leg. Back at the cave they fight like dogs over pieces of meat without bothering to hoard any or put any of the catch away, simply eating it on the spot. The women are continuously taken by force and raped whenever any of the men desires them in between stone age catfights.  The cave people are depicted as being incapable of speech and only able to use angry gestures. It was almost like watching the BET Awards on cable. As if there had ever been any Caucasians in the history of the planet who could organize no more social strategy than this under pressure of tough living conditions.

It was hilarious stuff because Homo Sapiens really thinks this is what Neanderthals were like. It was almost like watching the "TYME MASHEEN" at the end of IDIOCRACY to see what crude notions that Sapiens had formed of the past.

It doesn't occur to people that in this tough climate with tribal sizes so small, people with these general behavioral strategies, character makeup and personalities would likely be dead in a matter of days at best. At best. In fact, anybody with the general character of Homo Sapiens would be unlikely to survive a single winter in a climate much colder than the one he has taken for granted during the Holocene. They just don't have the right stuff for anything else.

This is about the phenomenon of projection. The truth is, the only way a**holes this pathetic could survive anywhere under any conditions is right now under the peculiar and unnatural conditions created by "civilization" in the Holocene. At no other time could such barbarism endure for long in the cold.

The evidence shows that Neanderthals and all K-types (conservative biological strategy) are the diametric opposite of these qualities in every possible way. They exhibit great care not only for their injured and wounded but even more respect when burying their dead. They demonstrate a deference to females in all matters of mate selection, never forcing themselves onto women for any reason at the risk of death or expulsion. They tend to decentralized leadership in which cooperation has a very high survival benefit for everyone who learns to avoid conflict and work together without dispute. Far from being promiscuous, the climate encourages lifelong monogamy, emphasis on child rearing and parental investment over and beyond anything Homo Sapiens has ever seen in his society of loose, ever changing sexual unions based on status and reputation. The natural selection for long term provisioning and anticipation of outcomes is very strong in these environments, with constant reinforcement. Far from being monomaniacal idiots driven by impulse gratification, there is evolutionary pressure at all times for stoicism, indifference to immediate needs and the ability to put away selfish motives for altruistic group benefits.

In short, I thought this film was about Homo Sapiens, not Neanderthals. Also, these guys were puny specimens in this movie. I've got more muscle mass on the inside of my big toe than these guys had on their backs and quadriceps. They were sunken chested girly men saps playing at Neanderthals and not very convincingly I might add. Neanderthals could have killed ten of these guys in ten seconds while playing an intense ping pong game with his free hand against the entire Chinese International team.

That Raquel Welch was one beautiful woman. In a Neanderthal tribe she would have picked a mate for many traits other than the ability to grunt and eat a drum leg, not least of which she would have looked for sincerity. Sincerity would reveal all the other traits above if they existed in the man. This is how the Neanderthal got the way he is, by women truly choosing men for their really good qualities for a million years. This is why brains got bigger and character got better in these men generation after generation. Once she had chosen her mate, the other men would have gotten over their disappointment quickly and they would have quickly shifted to treating her like a sister, championing her without assurance of sexual gratification because it would demonstrate to other women around her their good integrity as males, that they were ready to defend children and women as a general rule at all times against any kind of threat. By showing good sportsmanship at all times considering everything, Raquel's good looking sisters and relatives would begin to look fondly on that male as a good catch for themselves.

Neanderthals are easy to understand. They were the good ones. They were that way for a reason. They were the opposite of Homo Sapiens in every way you can imagine. The only thing the two species had in common was two legs, two arms and ten fingers and toes. Outside of this, nothing remotely alike.

11 comments:

ray said...

They demonstrate a deference to females in all matters of mate selection, never forcing themselves onto women for any reason at the risk of death or expulsion.


yes

i'm as antifeminist as they get, but this is the one area that females are designed to sense, out of authentic femininity

when females are left to their own natures, they know exactly who the "best" guy is


Sincerity would reveal all the other traits above if they existed in the man. This is how the Neanderthal got the way he is, by women truly choosing men for their really good qualities for a million years.


many females -- the ones not poisoned by feminism and inflated pride -- still do choose this way . . . they are quite capable of sensing authentic sincerity, and most certainly will respond to it

so this ability is not completely extinguished in modern females


Far from being monomaniacal idiots driven by impulse gratification, there is evolutionary pressure at all times for stoicism, indifference to immediate needs and the ability to put away selfish motives for altruistic group benefits.


the only people i've seen who fit these characteristics are certain small groups of nonverbal autistics

ironic bc regular society considers them solipsists!

cheers

Garry Joe said...

Children to be taught 'heterosexuality not the norm' in Australian schools project

http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/children-to-be-taught-39heterosexuality-not-the-norm39-in-australian-school

Garry Joe said...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TiXUF9xbTo&feature=youtu.be

Joss Whedon comes out against white preppers.

The left wing is an anti-white, genocidal outfit.

Héctor said...

Deference to females is a sign of weakness and the main reason feminism could come to life unopposed with its whole agenda.

I disagree with your theory about Neanderthals and humans but I cannot refute it since there is no evidence to, as well as there is not much evidence to substantiate it (real evidence like records or hybrid skeletons being discovered that can be confirmed to be modern Europeans thus proving irrefutably that this is particularity of the European peoples).

MOreover in saner societies women DIDN'T choose their partners, at least not by themselves, the societies developed a whole host of customs and traditions to ensure that women could really select the best available not exciting bums and casanovas and that includes the European world. So enough of this women warrior fantasies. Egalitarian societies have always being pushed aside by hierarchical ones.

Texas Arcane said...

Hector.

Human brain size has been shrinking continuously for 20,000 years.

Not because they are getting more efficient. Not because they are selecting the right mates.

You are right about one thing. Arranged marriages are an attempt to work around lower native intelligence in females by telling them who to marry. It isn't working.

There is no replacement for high native intelligence in females. There is no workaround. Low native intelligence in females leads to low native intelligence in human beings, sooner or later. Homo Sapiens has enjoyed a little siesta for a while with stolen brains but those are never going to last. He was not a bright creature originally and there is no cheating nature. Homo Sapiens was never designed to be able to think.

Garry Joe said...

Héctor said...
"the main reason feminism could come to life unopposed with its whole agenda."

Nothing in politics occurs on its own and there is no such thing as fate or coincidence. Politics is a form of psychological siege craft, waged against entire populations.

Feminism and all leftist policies, were forced through without permission, due to the following:

1) Clever psychological warfare, using a combination of carefully chosen and oft repeated words, combined with disciplined face to face activism, lasting many years.

2) Professional nepotism, to take control of each and every institution - The left never hire anyone but their own.

The left are masters of this warfare and the respectable right think themselves, too good for it.

This is why the march to the left seems inevitable, because the left have no effective opponents.


Texas Arcane said...

It is amusing to consider that people who lack a critical part of the brain involved in making value judgements (the amygdala) seize the moral high ground and believe they must be the good ones because they are incapable of knowing the difference between right and wrong.

Men who throw open the gates of the city believe themselves morally superior to the brave men who defend it's walls because they have brain damage. Brain damage and the left are one and the same thing. To be on the left is to be brain damaged.

Anonymous said...

http://mobile.businessweek.com/articles/2012-11-01/neanderthal-babies-all-around-synthetic-biology-is-closer-than-you-think

Rowan said...

http://www.cabinetmagazine.org/issues/42/wiles.php

"But Calhoun’s work was different. Vogt, Ehrlich, and the others were neo-Malthusians, arguing that population growth would cause our demise by exhausting our natural resources, leading to starvation and conflict. But there was no scarcity of food and water in Calhoun’s universe. The only thing that was in short supply was space. This was, after all, “heaven”—a title Calhoun deliberately used with pitch-black irony. The point was that crowding itself could destroy a society before famine even got a chance. In Calhoun’s heaven, hell was other mice. "

ray said...

Professional nepotism, to take control of each and every institution - The left never hire anyone but their own.


so true

20 years ago, academia was already conquered, largely in this way

it's been a long and victorious march since

Men who throw open the gates of the city believe themselves morally superior to the brave men who defend it's walls because they have brain damage

no they dont TA thats letting them off


it's a form of cowardice, and these "men" do it b/c p.c. pandering has material, financial, sexual, and especially psychological rewards

the leftie guys i used to know -- especially the married guys -- ALL were tremendously dependant psychologically on wives or girlfriends... far beyond what is healthy, for indvidual or nation

most males in america never actually become men -- not since the Seventies or so

Ave said...

Rowan, that is a very interesting subject you linked to.

Well worth investigation by others, if they still read this answer of mine.

Of course rats are not human, but that was not the point being made. That overpopulation led to madness and society decay was an absolute evidence, the study just confirmed it and narrowed it down.

There is a short biography of Calhoun here : http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/22514/1/2308Ramadams.pdf (linkf from the wikipedia article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_B._Calhoun )

In it you can see the same kind of obvious stalinist behaviours from the "scientists" against a man who saw it all, and was ready to spread the message. I like how, in the end of the paper, NIHM is being depicted as only geared towards chemical means of social control (Prozac etc.)

Like so many people who were obviously right, Calhoun was abandonned and ridiculed, and had to suffer from it, but reading on how this actually inspired him - and how natural it was, being even done by *rats* - is uplifting.

The Behavioural Sink is an extremely important concept. This is what is going to happen as soon as the lights go off.

My intuition is that refugee camps in Africa and elesewhere have been testing grounds for "Behavioural Sinks" (which are engineered - see Calhoun's experiments).

The Behavioural Sink is also to be linked with Marx's deptiction of the Lumpenproletariat.