Somebody recently asked me to devote a post to elaborating on a few of the ideas I have previously put up here. We had gone into great detail in private email correspondence and this person pointed out I have never put these facts I have marshalled for my arguments up here on Vault-Co. I am supposed to be working on my game tonight but here we go, I will lay out some of the influences on my conclusions in this post. I do want to save some stuff to go into my book so I will try to be brief.
Terrible errors persist in laymen about various aspects of admixture of genes because populists tasked with explaining science in public venues are so heavily burdened by political correctness it is nearly impossible for them to speak plainly and clearly on the subject.
Here are some important concepts to understand concerning mitochondrial DNA, stem cell development from root genes and what can happen when you try to mix two really different species forcibly through gang rape:
Genes are not like paints. You don't add red and white to get pink. It is not a useful analogy to compare paints with genes. The Neanderthal genome is mixed with Cro-Magnon components about as well as oil mixes with water. They are often at war for development of the resulting person. They settle out and sort themselves apart naturally because they are often biologically incompatible.
Where two genes involved in stem cell formation compete for pole position, you will often find they can thwart proper development of either one of their blueprints. Some genes just don't mix very well. One or the other can occupy the root stem cell but they cannot share influence on development. This is why trying to mix the gene for a Neanderthal amygdala (larger but less complex, better reaction time to threats with no social filters) and a Cro-Magnon amygdala (smaller but more complex, modified to permit social filters to interfere with perception of danger allowing Cro-Magnons to be ordered into life threatening situations on pretexts more easily) can often result in a person having almost no amygdala present at all. When the Neanderthal ultra-conservative K-Selected amygdala vies for control with the Cro-Magnon R-Selected slave amygdala, the result is frequently … nothing. The human being that comes out of this genetic train wreck will be an ultra-leftist because they have almost no amygdala at all.
There are a large number of genes involved in the immune response, processing of insulin, fatty acids in brain tissue and in cardiovascular systems that are identified as having originated with Neanderthals but now are implicated in weakened immune systems, diabetes, autism and cardiovascular disease. How many people honestly believe that Neanderthals had feeble immune systems, were diabetics, mentally disabled and had poor lung capacity? Especially since these same genes (when they develop properly) are also now being associated with superhuman immune response, unbelievably efficient insulin management, much higher average IQ and high altitude oxygen carrying capacity in the bloodstream?
Certain Neanderthal genes are associated somehow with speech impediments. Modern scientists, being largely a bunch of morons, immediately assume this means Neanderthals could not talk as well as modern people. In fact, I reckon the Neanderthals were hyper-articulate with voices pitched slightly higher and with a strange warble. Again, when these genes (also proven now to affect the hyoid bone) compete with grunter Cro-Magnon (he is not much more adept verbally now than he was 20,000 years ago) they can sometimes result in damaged/atrophied throat muscular apparatus that can impair speech or coordination of the throat. Otherwise they result in two very different types of communication skills. The frequency of hyper articulate people with Aspergers Syndrome is well documented in psychology.
If we consider the paucity of female mitochondria from Neanderthals, we can figure out easily what happened to it because of the breeding arrangements artificially created by turning the Neanderthal woman into a camp whore and turning their sons into a caste slave race forbidden to mate with human females.
It is common when two different species of animals are cross-bred for whatever reason, that mitochondrial DNA (female) and Y-Chromosome DNA (male) can have vastly different targets on critical genes where one or the other wins out or neither wins out. Whichever outcome, female mitochrondrial DNA can suffer if the breeding genders are slanted in certain directions. For example, when male lions mount female tigers in season, the male offspring have a tendency to be big because the male lion's DNA is pushing for large size. The female lion (the natural mate) has another gene that works against this selection so lions do not end up as big as houses. The female tiger has no such regulatory gene matched against the male lion's bigness promoting gene. So you can get really huge tigers out of this copulatory matchup. If Cro-Magnons have a gene that selects for boys (warlike breed with constant demand for expendable males) and they rape female Neanderthals with no regulatory gene to control gender distribution, then a surprising number of these unions would produce male Neanderthal hybrids out of the pregnancies that did not result in the Neanderthal woman bleeding to death from the RH blood clotting conflict documented by anthropologists and seen to this day in the Basque women. Early on, I figure these mostly boy Neanderthals were chained to a post and forced to make weapons for Cro-Magnon tribes. These boy slaves would have few opportunities to mate with Cro-Magnon females, especially if it was a crime punishable by death for both the male and female involved … which surviving celtic writings hint may have been the case. "Any woman who looks upon one of them with desire will be put to death and the one she has looked upon also will die." Where the birth was a beautiful Neanderthal female, she too becomes a camp whore and bears children by many Cro-Magnon men, as the genes seem to indicate.
So each successive generation, the male mitochondria of the Cro-Magnon rapist is washing out the continued survival of the original female Neanderthal mitochondria. Meanwhile, the Neanderthal male slaves do not begin to intermix regularly with Cro-Magnon females until many thousands of years later when the caste system becomes less strict. Many anthropologists have pointed out that it is difficult to practice strict caste separation in city states that have larger populations. As agriculture boomed and the empires began to appear, Neanderthals (like the Greeks that came later as slaves of the Romans) would continue to be regarded as a subclass and natural servants but increasingly found opportunities to interbreed more widely. The truth is, in large societies which succeed based on their capacity to delegate work to people sufficiently talented to accomplish it, it becomes an exercise in futility to keep your boot firmly on the Neanderthal slave's neck. Like sharecroppers or indentured journeymen it is possible that Neanderthals were still instinctively despised (often to this day) but found opportunities to solve problems and begrudgingly be regarded as indispensable in many quarters. The truth is that when you're the ones who can think, somebody is bound to pause the lash on your back occasionally if for no other reason than to allow you to get some work done for them.
Hope this helps explain some of my conclusions previously.