The government will protect your children.
Unless a gun is necessary for hunting, there is no reason for any private individual to own one, particularly someone in a family with school age children.
I can think of a reason.
Only criminals want to disarm their fellow man. It doesn't matter if they dress themselves up with respectability. The only person who would ever want to take away the right to defend oneself, especially from women and children, would be an evil person intending to do them harm whether they are conscious of that impulse or not. Most of mankind lacks the capacity for reflection, this means many terrible atrocities begin with somebody who does not have self-understanding.
Don't you think Stalin and Cromwell believed they knew what was best for others? Of course they did. But look at their fruits. Rivers of blood.
Tuesday, March 17, 2015
Monday, March 16, 2015
The Law Pertaining To "Gods" (Anointed Ones) In Akkadian
I was reading through the Hammurabic code last night and I noticed the same pattern of legal treatments applied to three different kinds of people in the ancient kingdoms of Sumeria and Akkadia.
There were basically three classifications of legal distinction in the Hammurabic code :
1. One applied to "Gods" (Incorrect english translation, better understood as anointed or highborn special people of the uppermost class of rulers, "them who wish not to be named," and "those who none dare challenge" in other contexts.)
2. One applied to the "servants" and "watchers" of the "Gods." (Better translated as a more muscular, more astute and more warrior-like slave or servant employed by the "Gods" to surround them, protect them, act as their delegates and serve them.) The laws seem to indicate there was often less mingling between the "watchers" and any other class of the society, as befits guards and sentries. This class of people is marked as capable of "great insight and craft" as found in The Book of Enoch in the Apocrypha.
3. One applied to the lowest grade of ordinary people, divided into "freemen" and "slaves." Their lives are not worthy of the death penalty in most cases, rather a mere fine for those who take them arbitrarily or who cheat them in a transaction or abuse them. As with Jimmy Savile, probably only applied on the rare instances someone had the nerve to dare accuse them.
Here is an example of how accusations of adultery towards the "Gods" were handled :
Slander :
Ex. Law #127: "If any one "point the finger" at a sister of a god or the wife of any one, and can not prove it, this man shall be taken before the judges and his brow shall be marked. (by cutting the skin, or perhaps hair.)"
There were basically three classifications of legal distinction in the Hammurabic code :
1. One applied to "Gods" (Incorrect english translation, better understood as anointed or highborn special people of the uppermost class of rulers, "them who wish not to be named," and "those who none dare challenge" in other contexts.)
2. One applied to the "servants" and "watchers" of the "Gods." (Better translated as a more muscular, more astute and more warrior-like slave or servant employed by the "Gods" to surround them, protect them, act as their delegates and serve them.) The laws seem to indicate there was often less mingling between the "watchers" and any other class of the society, as befits guards and sentries. This class of people is marked as capable of "great insight and craft" as found in The Book of Enoch in the Apocrypha.
3. One applied to the lowest grade of ordinary people, divided into "freemen" and "slaves." Their lives are not worthy of the death penalty in most cases, rather a mere fine for those who take them arbitrarily or who cheat them in a transaction or abuse them. As with Jimmy Savile, probably only applied on the rare instances someone had the nerve to dare accuse them.
Here is an example of how accusations of adultery towards the "Gods" were handled :
Slander :
The english world continues to insist that "Gods" is the right translation when in fact we discover here that the "Gods" walk down the street in plain view, can commit adultery with human beings and are so common as to carry their own distinction in the law as merely another class of people, albeit of a very distinguished nature. This has been a strong hint for over a century that many translations of Sumerian and Akkadian are inherently faulty in that they apparently confused mythical creatures with the very real men and women being spoken of.
In another place, we learn that these "Gods" were taller than ordinary people (the giant ruling class spoken of in Genesis) and that they "bore high crowns" to make themselves appear even taller than they were in the presence of commoners. I figure many of the women were 7 feet on average, plus a huge piece of headgear to give them the appearance of being nearly 8 feet tall. To such people the laws that govern the "Gods" were applied. It was obvious from their appearance to the lower classes who such people were. Today I am sure most of them would marvel at the fact that they occupy our leadership classes and modern people are less capable of distinguishing them by appearance than were the ancient commoners and peasants of Sumeria.
Lastly, wherever we have translated "God" in Akkadian, I do not think the Akkadians believed in a Supreme Being as do we Christians. I think scholars have translated "God" where they intended the "most high" melonhead ruler, unseen and in secret chambers where the commoners were never permitted to step. I am thinking of somebody like the surviving Atlantean ruler depicted in the movie "10,000 B.C." revered as a "supreme being" who is really just flesh and blood.
Lastly, wherever we have translated "God" in Akkadian, I do not think the Akkadians believed in a Supreme Being as do we Christians. I think scholars have translated "God" where they intended the "most high" melonhead ruler, unseen and in secret chambers where the commoners were never permitted to step. I am thinking of somebody like the surviving Atlantean ruler depicted in the movie "10,000 B.C." revered as a "supreme being" who is really just flesh and blood.
Sunday, March 15, 2015
Interesting New Theory On Stonehenge
Paradigm shattering vision describes Stonehenge as pedestal supports for a huge platform!
Very interesting and there is precedent to support the idea.
Amazing how people can go along for three centuries all acting on basic assumptions about Stonehenge until someone comes along who can see what is right in front of everybody else. It is the assumptions that preclude progress in almost every field of science. If they are not well-founded they are just clever obstructions.
Very interesting and there is precedent to support the idea.
Amazing how people can go along for three centuries all acting on basic assumptions about Stonehenge until someone comes along who can see what is right in front of everybody else. It is the assumptions that preclude progress in almost every field of science. If they are not well-founded they are just clever obstructions.
Saturday, March 14, 2015
Deflating The Big Bang In One Pop
Milky Way now believed to be much larger than before.
You don't need a degree in astrophysics to understand this one.
If the Milky Way is 165 quadrillion km across, supposedly having expanded from a small concentrated ball of matter around the time of the "Big Bang," then how did it expand to 150 thousand light years in diameter in "13.2" billion years (they claim it as the age of the universe) when astrophysicists say it was only expanding at light speed during the first few minutes of the "Big Bang." According to them, it would scarcely be expanding at all during the ensuing 15 billion years that followed. According to their calculations it should not exceed ten thousand light years in diameter.
Guess what their explanation is? You got it right. "Dark Matter" created sufficient mass inertia to make the Milky Way expand at the rate they required to fit their projections. So what is the mathematical figure associated with "Dark Matter" in how much it accelerates expansions? Whatever you want it to be. It is a magic number of something you can't see, measure or register on any instrument. It exists because scienmagists say if it didn't that would mean they are complete idiots.
You don't need a degree in astrophysics to understand this one.
If the Milky Way is 165 quadrillion km across, supposedly having expanded from a small concentrated ball of matter around the time of the "Big Bang," then how did it expand to 150 thousand light years in diameter in "13.2" billion years (they claim it as the age of the universe) when astrophysicists say it was only expanding at light speed during the first few minutes of the "Big Bang." According to them, it would scarcely be expanding at all during the ensuing 15 billion years that followed. According to their calculations it should not exceed ten thousand light years in diameter.
Guess what their explanation is? You got it right. "Dark Matter" created sufficient mass inertia to make the Milky Way expand at the rate they required to fit their projections. So what is the mathematical figure associated with "Dark Matter" in how much it accelerates expansions? Whatever you want it to be. It is a magic number of something you can't see, measure or register on any instrument. It exists because scienmagists say if it didn't that would mean they are complete idiots.
Friday, March 13, 2015
Drink Up
Fluoride is a health supplement, sunlight is bad for you and meat gives you heart disease.
This is the world I live in.
This is the world I live in.
Let's Investigate Harmless Dead People
If the same people are not still in power, how come the police are only allowed to "investigate" people after they have died?
As I have said before, until I see the paramilitary force breaking down the gate of Buckingham Palace with a battering ram I will never believe that any of this is anything but grandiose theatre.
Prince Charles had no interest whatsoever sexually in Princess Diana, his beautiful blushing bride at the height of her fertility. Everyone knows who fathered her son and it wasn't Charles.
Prince Charles had his good, close personal friend Jimmy Savile knighted after rumours circulated widely about him being a notorious pedophile. Prince Charles often received Savile in private at the palace and spent long hours discussing their next caper, enjoying the closest intimate friendship with him for many, many years.
Never forget this smug, self-righteous professionally unemployed man has been one of the leading lights of the totalitarian environmentalism movement worldwide and a proponent of carbon trading schemes to curb "emissions" for decades. He has thrown his weight behind it to get legislation drafted supporting a central international control of resources pursuant to world government for most of his life. How much do you want to bet the Rothschild family pulls this guy's strings like a human puppet with what they've got on him?
Savile bragged on camera shortly before he died to Louis Theroux that he was "untouchable" because of his connections to the very highest levels of the British government and Buckingham palace.
If you wonder why we devote so much blog to this topic, it is because we believe it highlights the colossal canyon between the world people think they live in and the world they really live in. These people are the same people selling you the lies that they want you to believe because it renders you harmless to them and powerless to protect yourself. Civil Defense today consists of ignoring these idiots and realising you can't trust a single word you hear from people like this. Not a word. Nobody is coming to protect Western Civilization and nobody is coming to protect you. It is left to you to see to these things because these guys are driving the demolition truck. They are not the good guys. They are the bad guys and they are in charge. Think about it.
NASA Reads Vault-Co
Totally out in left field? Or a home run before most people realize the game has started?
Vault-Co was here 12 years ago.
NASA apparently considers this issue so important as to devote the majority of its efforts to uncovering the strange phenomena seen now in the Earth's magnetic field.
Before we were right, Robert Felix was right. We just had the good sense to recognise superb real science when we saw it.
Vault-Co was here 12 years ago.
NASA apparently considers this issue so important as to devote the majority of its efforts to uncovering the strange phenomena seen now in the Earth's magnetic field.
Before we were right, Robert Felix was right. We just had the good sense to recognise superb real science when we saw it.
Thursday, March 12, 2015
Merck Faked MMR Vaccine Trial Results and Effectiveness
FAKED!!!
The untouchable, unassailable religious faith-based MMR!!! Only a conspiracy nut would dare suggest it was hurting more kids than it ever helped!
Being sued by U.S. Federal government for FRAUD. I bet you think I made this story up. Nope.
The untouchable, unassailable religious faith-based MMR!!! Only a conspiracy nut would dare suggest it was hurting more kids than it ever helped!
Being sued by U.S. Federal government for FRAUD. I bet you think I made this story up. Nope.
A Grand Minimum By Any Other Name
Vault-Co called it over a decade ago.
This stuff is nothing but preliminaries. The climate is just grumbling and preparing to roll over.
It is the implications that will get you.
This stuff is nothing but preliminaries. The climate is just grumbling and preparing to roll over.
It is the implications that will get you.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

.jpg)