
All real scientific advances start this way.
In the beginning, eccentrics and uncredited fringe cranks present an idea which is so counter-intuitive to the prevailing orthodoxy it is branded as insane. The traditional priesthood is so threatened by the idea they pretend it is irrational and completely without merit, not even warranting consideration.
Then other outsiders get on board. Some people closer to the mainstream concede reluctantly there may be something useful here without actually admitting the new notion is plausible and solves a lot of problems.
After that, your really good academics and intellectuals, the ones who themselves are usually on the outside even in the best of times, chime in and declare there is definitely something here. The usual suspects continue to act as though this heresy is ridiculous and attack everybody associated with it, starting with the original radical thinkers who came up with it.
Within a very short time following this ugly purge and pogrom, it will start to become so obvious that even the dullest laymen will know in their hearts this new paradigm has totally demolished the old one.
Nevertheless, for a long time into the future the orthodoxy will view it with irregular skepticism which is commonly only relieved when they die and are replaced by a new generation who have grown accustomed to it and can discuss it without feeling overwhelming bitterness and hatred towards it no matter how true it might be.
Magnetic reversal is about lighting a candle in the darkness that is called the sum of human knowledge. It is the beginning of honest inquiry into what is going on upon this planet, how we got here and what we have been through. Instead of resorting to UFOs and spirits from another world, we can start to explain things with far greater confidence that there is a foundation of evidence that supports our assertions.
For example ... why are people so amnesiac about the past? Why do they forget what has happened so easily? Perhaps these qualities are necessary on a planet subject to regular catastrophic change. Maybe it is a survival quality in men to get on with it without dwelling too much or too long on your experiences. Can you imagine situations where the capacity for deep self-reflection might not be advantageous to preserving life? I'm sure if you use your imagination a little you can see how that could have happened to mankind. The next time you look into their faces and are wondering how come the lights are on but nobody's home, remember that it is possible that is what has resulted from natural selection. This doesn't mean it is a superior trait. Evolution is not about "superior" traits in the way that most people think. Neanderthals had plenty of "superior" traits and look, the poor bastards are extinct.
P.S. Watch the video at the link and take note ... once again, the oral tradition that white western eggheads are always sneering at is not only the one type of knowledge retrieval that survived - it is to this day proving to be more accurate than the scientific orthodoxy! If I were a career scientist I would do nothing but study ancient myths and then try to discover their basis in fact. I'd have Nobel Prizes stacked to the ceiling in my garage if science worked this way. Unfortunately, it doesn't.
