User talk:George Chernilevsky

I respond to messages left on this talk page here, not on the talk pages of the users who left them.

Archives 2009 (1) | 2009 (2) | 2009 (3) | 2010 (1) | 2010 (2) | 2010 (3) 2010 (4) | 2010 (5) | 2010 (6) | 2011 (1) | 2011 (2) | 2011 (3) 2011 (4) | 2012 (1) | 2012 (2) | 2012 (3) | 2013 (1) | 2014 (1) 2015 (1) | 2015 (2) | 2015 (3) | 2016 (1) | 2016 (2) | 2017 (1)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Tractor DT-75 Bulldozer 2017 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:46, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Note

Hi George,

I trust you are fine. It seems you forgot to click on deletion button here. What's going on? With kind regards. Wikicology (talk) 19:34, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi!

See history:

13:19, 21/01/2017‎ - deleted by me

18:58, 21/01/2017‎ - uploaded again by Jack sotomayor and in use now.

With best regards, --George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:44, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Laetiporus sulphureus 2017 G01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. FP? --Livioandronico2013 13:01, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Tractor DT-75 Bulldozer 2017 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments I see only a bit of the Bulldozer but it is a good quality and an interesting image. -- Spurzem 22:55, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Laetiporus sulphureus 2017 G02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good qality --Llez 15:01, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Myocastor coypus 2016 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:07, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Myocastor coypus 2016 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:53, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Myocastor coypus 2016 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

What exactly does 'deleted edits' mean in the Wikimedia User Analysis Tool?

Hi George, I tried but couldn't find an answer in the Wikimedia glossary -- what exactly does 'deleted edits' mean? Thanks for any help! --BeckenhamBear (talk) 15:06, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Hi!

Deleted edits is a contribution of the user (creating or editing pages), which was later removed. Very often this is normal and useful for our project contribution (discussing on a temporary special pages, clarification, etc.). Nomination for deletion of other files also adds to deleted edits. And so, almost all active admins has thousands of deleted edits. To deleted edits also added mistakenly uploaded files by user that were nominated for deletion and subsequently removed.

With best regards, --George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:23, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

 Done. Already participated in the survey -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:58, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! UAZ-452 Medical (EMS) 2017 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments some blown whites in the snow, but overall good quality. --Carschten 00:54, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Locomotive 2M62-0400 2017 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments difficult light conditions well done managed. Good quality. --Carschten 00:54, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Vorokhta Viaduct 2017 G4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. Slight posterization in the sky but hardly noteworthy. --Peulle 20:25, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Vorokhta Viaduct 2017 G5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 20:25, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Vorokhta Viaduct 2017 G6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Very nice. Perspective is as should be. --Peulle 20:25, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Vorokhta Viaduct 2017 G7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Looks good. --Peulle 20:25, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Vorokhta Viaduct 2017 G8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. Thanks for your contribution of free images to Commons. If you could shoot an "overview! photo of the whole viaduct too, that would be most welcome. :) --Peulle 20:25, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Horse closeup 2017 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:31, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Horse closeup 2017 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 10:49, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Image deletions

Hi George
Sorry to be a pain - Could you undelete all of these files and close them as Keep please?

• Commons:Deletion requests/File:Moffat & Williamson Glenrothes depot 20 Nov 2012 YN54 WCM back panel (8203708894).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Moffat & Williamson MX55 BYH ex Irvin of law (8747254665).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Moffat & Williamson MX55 BYH ex Irvin of law (8748376516).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Moffat & Williamson SK08CRX (15175103240).jpg
  

I recently nominated more of them - All of which were closed as Keep by 2 different admins - Apparently my reasons weren't valid (I disagree entirely but I'd rather not rant about it but to save future shit with you and I it's probably best they're all undeleted),
Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 23:12, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi!

Please have look to Undeletion_requests and create requests, if really needed.

In my opinion, deletion closed fine with correct reason (really poor quality images with possibly tiny EV).

With best regards, --George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:44, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi George, Okie dokie thanks, As another admin also agrees with my nominations of these it's good to know I'm doing something right! ,

I don't think I'll ever understand how the rest were kept but anyway thanks for your help & for your backing,

Have a great day & Happy editing :), –Davey2010^Talk 22:32, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Bohdan Khmelnytsky Kiev 2017 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 04:44, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Drill bits 2017 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Crisco 1492 01:59, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! St Sophia bell tower Kiev 2017 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:59, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Request for restore my picture

sir you delete my own picture https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:This_is_me_in_2016.jpg

[1] you can check my personal account for evidence Hammadsaeed (talk) 10:35, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

User:JJMC89 do vandalism he delete my evidence record you can check [2] [3] Hammadsaeed (talk) 10:37, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Hello,

please read careful:

Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose

Commons:Project scope

Commons is not your personal free web host

Commons is not a place to advertise

So, this deletion is correct by our rules. With best regards and very friendly, --George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:55, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

sir can i upload my pic now?? Hammadsaeed (talk) 13:19, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Have you read our rules? The link above --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:15, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Yes now i read thank you George 😕 Hammadsaeed (talk) 07:10, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! ER9M-519 train 2017 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:13, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Chelidonium majus 2017 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:36, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Chelidonium majus 2017 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:21, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Chelidonium majus 2017 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:52, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Old tower top 2017 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments I'd say this is just over the threshold for QI now that we are som used to HDR photos of buildings during the blue hour, but for a "normal" shot it's ok. --W.carter 19:34, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Forest road Slavne 2017 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:48, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Church of the Dormition of the Theotokos Yaremche 2017 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:08, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Church of the Dormition of the Theotokos Yaremche 2017 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:08, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Forest road Slavne 2017 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:46, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Vinca minor 2017 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 09:51, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

Hello George Chernilevsky, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Kempa Vinnitsa 2017 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality --Halavar 10:28, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Lupines field UA 2017 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:25, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Lupines field UA 2017 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 22:04, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Locomotive ChS4-111 2017 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:19, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Korosten Porcelain 2017 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Weak support The patterns are in focus, although for a studio type shot the sharpness could be better.--Peulle 12:20, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Telega in Sosonka 2017 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:07, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Domestic goat 2017 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Domestic goat 2017 G4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 00:33, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Living Statue 2017 G05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Living Statue 2017 G01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good focus to main part of the photo --Michielverbeek 19:29, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Living Statue 2017 G02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:11, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Domestic goat 2017 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:10, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Domestic goat 2017 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:09, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Edible fungi 2017 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments GQ Ezarate 17:29, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Living Statue 2017 G11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:28, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Living Statue 2017 G06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:19, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Living Statue 2017 G08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 16:07, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Living Statue 2017 G09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. Interesting costume. --Peulle 16:07, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Living Statue 2017 G03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support No FOP in Ukraine :P, Good quality. --C messier 07:05, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Locomotive VL80K-182 2017 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 02:47, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Locomotive ChS4-211 2017 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:13, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Lucanus cervus male 2017 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good photo. Also VI. --Peulle 15:46, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Locomotive VL80K-093 2017 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:32, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Sedum acre 2017 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good image but seems to me it could use a slight (5%?) crop along the top.--Shankar Raman 13:56, 19 July 2017 (UTC) Good quality. Agree with your response in my talk page --Shankar Raman 17:32, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lucanus cervus (Stag beetle), male in wild.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:48, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

•  Oppose George, I would support another of your images as much better for VI File:Lucanus cervus male 2008 G1.jpg. Charles (talk) 13:03, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Support I think this one is the best since we're only looking at them as thumbnails in VI. The colour is better IMO.--Peulle (talk) 13:28, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

We are not just looking at thumbnails in VI. Charles (talk) 10:25, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

What I mean is that the VI review size is not the same as in QIC (that surprised me when I came here, but it makes sense): "The image must look good on-screen at the review size (e.g. 480x360 pixels for a standard 4:3 landscape image). Its usability in printed format is not considered.".--Peulle (talk) 13:33, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment Peulle is right, The coloring of elytra is very typical for this species. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 18:18, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Basket with vegetables 2017 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality --Llez 16:45, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Papaver rhoeas 2017 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:10, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Locomotive VL80S-2332 2017 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good qyality, Tournasol7 16:04, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Locomotive 2M62U-0213 2017 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:42, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Papaver rhoeas 2017 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 16:18, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Commons Conference project

Hello

I'm writing you as one of the most active Commons users right now. Since a while now, the idea of a dedicated Commons conference has been floating around. But since the last Wikimania concrete steps have been taken to actually make it happen next year. If you're interested in participation or maybe willing to help organize the first ever Commons Conference, I invite you to check out the project page and leave your comments; or just show your support for the idea, by signing up.

Cheers,

--Touzrimounir (talk) 22:16, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Locomotive VL40U-1025 2 2017 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support Hight quality IMO--Lmbuga 21:43, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Khadzhibey left forecastle 2017 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality --Capricorn4049 21:10, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Khadzhibey left forecastle 2017 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality --Capricorn4049 21:10, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Khadzhibey right forecastle 2017 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality --Capricorn4049 21:10, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Avant tugboat 2017 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:17, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! ER9E-657 train 2017 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 20:31, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! ER9E-657 train 2017 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 21:46, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 22:38, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Подати маяк на ВЛП

Привіт, Георгію. Чи погодились би Ви подати цей маяк на конкурс Вікі любить пам'ятки? Достатньо, щоб Ви поставили в опис {{Wiki Loves Monuments 2017|ua}} і цим особисто засвідчили свою участь. Якщо потім ще чогось бракуватиме в оформленні, я додам. Вибачте, що турбую.--Aeou 08:31, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Привіт!

Дякую, але не треба. Я беру участь в жюрі, як завжди, тому мої роботи в конкурс не потрапляють.

З повагою, Георгій --George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:21, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Vorontsov Lighthouse 2017 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 20:23, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Vorontsov Lighthouse 2017 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:40, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Palaemon elegans 2017 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:23, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Vorontsov Lighthouse 2017 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 05:55, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Port of Odessa UA 2017 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality --Halavar 14:54, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Port of Odessa UA 2017 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality --Halavar 14:54, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Port of Odessa UA 2017 G4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Might be sharper, but it's OK for a QI --Halavar 18:56, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Keelby tugboat 2017 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 09:30, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Commons:Форум#Ваши фотографии никому здесь не нужны

Добрый день. Если у вас будет время, не могли бы вы высказаться об этой ситуации? Большое спасибо. --Shakko (talk) 18:56, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Good admin

Hi. I guess User:Vikizere could use some Commons-vacations. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 07:30, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

 Done -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:06, 1 November 2017 (UTC)